Tuesday, July 17, 2012

Sources of Funding for the Public Safety Broadband Network


I was on a call this morning that got me thinking about the sources of funding for the Nations Public Safety Broadband Network (PSBN). You have the usual suspects of funding sources, i.e. State and Federal tax dollars through grant programs, but there are a many more sources that could be garnered.

Beyond the typical Project Financing realm, and doable within the framework of a Public Private Partnership, you have a host of government and commercial/corporate vehicles.

In the commercial/corporate vehicles you have commercial lenders, capital market bonds, equity funds, credit agencies, development finance institutions, bilateral agencies, multilateral banks and sovereign wealth funds. There are many forms of grants, loans, bonds and tools utilized with varying degrees of complexities and politics, but they are doable and used quite often everywhere in the world....some more than others. 

Government vehicles within our borders tend to be isolated to large-scale projects and programs and are delivered through a complex mechanism of grants, bonds and agency budgets.  But most particularly are the budgets allocated to State Agencies through Federal Agencies. A good example would a State’s internal Department of Transportation. A statewide deployment of PSBN will undoubtedly require the involvement of the States Department of Transportation (most particularly mass transit and highways). Being that the Federal Government has allocated $7 Billion to stimulate the creation of the nations PSBN -- that is just one course of available funding. Another course would be through allocated budgets within the Federal Highway Administration as well as the Federal Department of Transportation. The organizations already allocate a certain amount of funding to help build the inherent technologies that secure and maintain major transportation projects, i.e. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). There is no discerning differences between an ITS program and the requirement for broadband access within the State DOT. One view is from the DOT business objectives itself (running transportation for the State) and the other is the DOTs requirement for Public Safety; both function using the same technologies. We can then easily ascertain that it is feasible that these sources of budget allocations could also be considered as part of the overall allocation for PSBN. This is not unique to the transportation market…the same can be said for power and the DOE (Department of Energy), or Forestry and the DOA (Department of Agriculture), etc..

Another, and more lucrative alternative, is the private investment scenario. I covered this in an earlier topic on the make-up of a Public Private Partnership. In short, there area available sources of funding through private investors to buy a shares of the P3 SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle). The SPV will be equipped to generate long-term recurring revenue – which is a prime reason LTE was created in the first place…that is to make money. Private investors will see the liquidity of the long-term SLA arrangements between State and Federal Agencies and their required access to the LTE broadband services. In my mind this is probably the most lucrative of the sources of funding and could even impact the necessity to even use State or Federal funding programs. There would be no end-in-sight for the amount of private investors to help make this happen.

Just some guy and a blog…


1 comment:

Mike said...

Comment was made about Vendor Financing.

For Private, yes, vendors can also be included, but a majority of it will be the big bank and investment houses...even private investors themselves, i.e. Warren Buffett and the likes. Anything outside of Government can be viewed as private. Usually vendors just want to finance their gear.

For a typical full-scale deployment more than 80% of the project will be services oriented, i.e. PMO, construction, design, deployment, engineering, etc.. There is usually less than 15% associated with materials, i.e. gravel, towers, screws and equipment. Of that 15% usually about 4-5% has to do with actual communication vendor gear, i.e. Cisco, Alcatel, Ericsson, etc.. It is not typical for a vendor, that is providing material, to finance the entire build or project. In doing so they would expose themselves to risk that is not associated with their business. It doesn't mean that some vendors have not tried...but those efforts were the result due to their lack of knowledge of the entire scope of the program or some individual convincing them that they needed too.

Moto

Words to Live By: “Here’s to the crazy ones, the misfits, the rebels, the troublemakers, the round pegs in the square holes… The ones who see things differently — they’re not fond of rules… You can quote them, disagree with them, glorify or vilify them, but the only thing you can’t do is ignore them because they change things… They push the human race forward, and while some may see them as the crazy ones, we see genius, because the ones who are crazy enough to think that they can change the world, are the ones who do.” (Steve Jobs)